Search

» » Continuous air purification by aqueous interface filtration and absorption - Nature.com

Continuous air purification by aqueous interface filtration and absorption - Nature.com

kembaliui.blogspot.com

Abstract

The adverse impact of particulate air pollution on human health1,2 has prompted the development of purification systems that filter particulates out of air3,4,5. To maintain performance, the filter units must inevitably be replaced at some point, which requires maintenance, involves costs and generates solid waste6,7. Here we show that an ion-doped conjugated polymer-coated matrix infiltrated with a selected functional liquid enables efficient, continuous and maintenance-free air purification. As the air to be purified moves through the system in the form of bubbles, the functional fluid provides interfaces for filtration and for removal of particulate matter and pollutant molecules from air. Theoretical modelling and experimental results demonstrate that the system exhibits high efficiency and robustness: its one-time air purification efficiency can reach 99.6%, and its dust-holding capacity can reach 950 g m−2. The system is durable and resistant to fouling and corrosion, and the liquid acting as filter can be reused and adjusted to also enable removal of bacteria or odours. We anticipate that our purification approach will be useful for the development of specialist air purifiers that might prove useful in a settings such as hospitals, factories and mines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Principle and air purification performance of the ELBS.
Fig. 2: Preparation and filtration process of ELBS.
Fig. 3: Microbubble generation and particle absorption process of the ELBS.
Fig. 4: Applications and performance of ELBS.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Nel, A. Air pollution-related illness: effects of particles. Science 308, 804–806 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dedoussi, I. C., Eastham, S. D., Monier, E. & Barrett, S. R. H. Premature mortality related to United States cross-state air pollution. Nature 578, 261–265 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stanford, M. G. et al. Self-sterilizing laser-induced graphene bacterial air filter. ACS Nano 13, 11912–11920 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, G. H. et al. High-performance particulate matter including nanoscale particle removal by a self-powered air filter. Nat. Commun. 11, 1653 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Q. et al. Polarity-dominated stable N97 respirators for airborne virus capture based on nanofibrous membranes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 23756–23762 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, Y. et al. Preparation of nanofibrous metal-organic framework filters for efficient air pollution control. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 5785–5788 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, G. L. et al. A review of air filtration technologies for sustainable and healthy building ventilation. Sustain. Cities Soc. 32, 375–396 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, C. et al. Transparent air filter for high-efficiency PM2.5 capture. Nat. Commun. 6, 6205 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, M. et al. Novel hollow fiber air filters for the removal of ultrafine particles in PM2.5 with repetitive usage capability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 10041–10049 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhong, Z. et al. Unusual air filters with ultrahigh efficiency and antibacterial functionality enabled by ZnO nanorods. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 21538–21544 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Omota, F., Dimian, A. C. & Bliek, A. Adhesion of solid particles to gas bubbles. Part 1: modelling. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61, 823–834 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dedovets, D. et al. Multiphase microreactors based on liquid-liquid and gas-liquid dispersions stabilized by colloidal catalytic particles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 2–25 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, M. & Guiraud, P. Surface-modified microbubbles (colloidal gas aphrons) for nanoparticle removal in a continuous bubble generation-flotation separation system. Water Res. 126, 399–410 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wesley, D. J., Smith, R. M., Zimmerman, W. B. & Howse, J. R. Influence of surface wettability on microbubble formation. Langmuir 32, 1269–1278 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown, K. L. & Wray, S. in Hygiene in Food Processing (eds Lelieveld, H. L. M., Holah, J. T. & Napper, D.) 174–202 (Woodhead Publishing, 2014).

  16. Agarwal, A., Ng, W. J. & Liu, Y. Principle and applications of microbubble and nanobubble technology for water treatment. Chemosphere 84, 1175–1180 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hou, X., Hu, Y., Grinthal, A., Khan, M. & Aizenberg, J. Liquid-based gating mechanism with tunable multiphase selectivity and antifouling behaviour. Nature 519, 70–73 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alvarenga, J. et al. Research Update: Liquid gated membrane filtration performance with inorganic particle suspensions. APL Mater. 6, 100703 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mao, X. W. et al. Energetically efficient electrochemically tunable affinity separation using multicomponent polymeric nanostructures for water treatment. Energ. Environ. Sci. 11, 2954–2963 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pich, J. & Schutz, W. On the theory of particle deposition in rising gas-bubbles: the absorption minimum. J. Aerosol Sci. 22, 267–272 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei, Y., Zhang, Q. & Thompson, J. E. The wetting behavior of fresh and aged soot studied through contact angle measurements. Atmos. Clim. Sci. 7, 11–22 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Binks, B. P. & Lumsdon, S. Influence of particle wettability on the type and stability of surfactant-free emulsions. Langmuir 16, 8622–8631 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar, B., Patil, A. J. & Mann, S. Enzyme-powered motility in buoyant organoclay/DNA protocells. Nat. Chem. 10, 1154–1163 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, P. et al. Metal-organic frameworks with photocatalytic bactericidal activity for integrated air cleaning. Nat. Commun. 10, 2177 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tian, E. et al. Ultralow resistance two-stage electrostatically assisted air filtration by polydopamine coated PET coarse filter. Small 17, e2102051 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiao, R., Mo, J., Zhang, Y. & Gao, D. An in-situ thermally regenerated air purifier for indoor formaldehyde removal. Indoor Air 28, 266–275 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lu, W. et al. Polyamine-tethered porous polymer networks for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 7480–7484 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Harmelen, A., Kok, H. & Visschedijk, A. Potentials and Costs to Reduce PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions from Industrial Sources in the Netherlands (TNO Environment, Energy and Process Innovation, 2002).

  29. Chen, L., Li, P., Liu, G., Cheng, W. & Liu, Z. Development of cement dust suppression technology during shotcrete in mine of China – a review. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 55, 232–242 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu, M. M. et al. Electrospun nanofibers membranes for effective air filtration. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 302, 1600353 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, M., Nie, F. Q., Wei, Z., Song, Y. & Jiang, L. In situ electrochemical switching of wetting state of oil droplet on conducting polymer films. Langmuir 26, 3993–3997 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Young, T. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 95, 65–87 (1805).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Owens, D. K. & Wendt, R. C. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 13, 1741–1747 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kape, A., Ruick, B. & Drusch, S. Characterisation of the work of adhesion of food grade coating materials on a maltodextrin model surface. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 110, 152–159 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Harris, A. F. & Beevers, A. The effects of grit-blasting on surface properties for adhesion. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 19, 445–452 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kwon, G. et al. On-demand separation of oil-water mixtures. Adv. Mater. 24, 3666–3671 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, C. J., Liang, B., Tang, S. W. & Min, E. Z. Effects of orifice orientation and gas-liquid flow pattern on initial bubble size. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 21, 1206–1215 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Longuet-Higgins, M. S., Kerman, B. R. & Lunde, K. The release of air bubbles from an underwater nozzle. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 365–390 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Higuera, F. J. Injection and coalescence of bubbles in a very viscous liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 530, 369–378 (2005).

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Ghiaasiaan, S. M. & Yao, G. F. A theoretical model for deposition of aerosols in rising spherical bubbles due to diffusion, convection, and inertia. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 26, 141–153 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Charvet, A., Bardin-Monnier, N. & Thomas, D. Can bubble columns be an alternative to fibrous filters for nanoparticles collection? J. Hazard. Mater. 195, 432–439 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ghiaasiaan, S. M. & Yao, G. F. Diffusive and convective deposition of aerosols in rising spherical bubbles with internal circulation. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 21, 907–918 (1995).

    CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Licht, W. The movement of aerosol particles. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 23, 657–678 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Larmour, I. A., Bell, S. E. & Saunders, G. C. Remarkably simple fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces using electroless galvanic deposition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 1710–1712 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu, M., Wang, S. & Jiang, L. Nature-inspired superwettability systems. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17036 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Binks, B. P. Particles as surfactants – similarities and differences. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 7, 21–41 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wallis, G. B. The terminal speed of single drops or bubbles in an infinite medium. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 1, 491–511 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tan, K. L., Tan, B. T. G., Kang, E. T. & Neoh, K. G. The chemical nature of the nitrogens in polypyrrole and polyaniline: a comparative-study by x-ray photoelectron-spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 94, 5382–5388 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Tan, X., Hu, C., Zhu, Z., Liu, H. & Qu, J. Electrically pore-size-tunable polypyrrole membrane for antifouling and selective separation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1903081 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang, H. et al. Design of three-dimensional gradient nonwoven composites with robust dust holding capacity for air filtration. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 136, 47827 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Liu, J. et al. Low resistance bicomponent spunbond materials for fresh air filtration with ultra-high dust holding capacity. RSC Adv. 7, 43879–43887 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Liu, J. et al. Polyethylene/polypropylene bicomponent spunbond air filtration materials containing magnesium stearate for efficient fine particle capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 40592–40601 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu, B., Zhang, S., Wang, X., Yu, J. & Ding, B. Efficient and reusable polyamide-56 nanofiber/nets membrane with bimodal structures for air filtration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 457, 203–211 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Li, Y. Y. et al. Semi-interpenetrating polymer network biomimetic structure enables superelastic and thermostable nanofibrous aerogels for cascade filtration of PM2.5. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1910426 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 52025132, 21975209, 21621091, 22021001 and 22121001), the National Key R&D Programme of China (grant no. 2018YFA0209500), the 111 Project (grant nos. B17027 and B16029) and the Science and Technology Projects of Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (grant no. RD2022070601). We thank L. Huang, L. Min, B. Chen, H. Liu, D. Wu and K. Zhan for their support and discussion of the synthesis and measurements of the materials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

    Yunmao Zhang, Yuhang Han, Long Qiao, Zhizhi Sheng, Chunyan Wang, Shuli Wang, Yaqi Hou, Xinyu Chen & Xu Hou

  2. Soft Matter & Complex Fluids Group, School of Physical Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China

    Xiaoliang Ji & Duyang Zang

  3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

    Zhizhi Sheng, Shuli Wang & Xu Hou

  4. Department of Physics, Research Institute for Biomimetics and Soft Matter, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Soft Functional Materials Research, Jiujiang Research Institute, College of Physical Science and Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

    Miao Wang & Xu Hou

  5. Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (IKKEM), Xiamen, China

    Xu Hou

Authors
  1. Yunmao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuhang Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoliang Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Duyang Zang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Long Qiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhizhi Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chunyan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shuli Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Miao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yaqi Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xinyu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Xu Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.H. conceived the project and designed the research. Y.Z. and S.W. synthesized the materials. Y.Z., Y. Han, Z.S., Y. Hou, C.W. and M.W. prepared and characterized the samples, and analysed the data. Y.Z., L.Q. and Y. Han performed the pressure, microbubble size and air purification experiments and analysed the data. Y.Z., X.J., D.Z., Z.S. and L.Q. built the mathematical model. Y.Z, X.C. and X.H. wrote the manuscript. All the authors contributed to the data analysis, discussion and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu Hou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Pascal Guiraud and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 The electrochemical polymerization of doped PPy.

a. The photo of the electrochemical polymerization setup. b. Current density dependent electrochemical polymerization time. Inset: Charge density dependent electrochemical polymerization time. c. The optical images of doped PPy coated SSM at different polymerization times. d. SEM images of doped PPy coated SSM at different polymerization times.

Extended Data Fig. 2 The surface composition analysis of DPM in the redox process.

a. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curve of DPM in 0.1 M LiClO4 at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1. The curve shows the reversibility of the redox process with an oxidization peak at 0.12 V and a reduction peak at − 0.39 V. b. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey scans of DPM in different states, which prove the matrix surface composition changes in the redox process. c, d. High-resolution Li 1s XPS spectra of DPM in the reduction state (c) and the oxidation state (d), which show the Li+ ions doping and dedoping during the redox processes. e, f. High-resolution N 1s XPS spectra of DPM in the reduction state (e) and the oxidation state (f). Four types of nitrogen environments are present in DPM. The higher peaks at 401.4 eV and 402.9 eV can be assigned to the positively charged –HN+– and bipolarons moieties48. The positively charged N moieties are higher in the oxidation state, which indicates that the redox reaction have occurred on the DPM.

Extended Data Fig. 3 The wettability and morphology of the DPF in the redox process.

a. The self-designed setup for in situ monitoring the contact angle of a dichloromethane droplet on the DPF during adjusting the electrochemical potentials underwater. A three-electrode system was used to control the electrochemical potential. DPF was served as the working electrode. Ag/AgCl electrode and a platinum plate were used as the reference electrode and the counter electrode, respectively. 0.1 M LiClO4 aqueous solution was used as the electrolyte. b. Reversible wettability switching of the functional liquid on DPF during the continuous cycle redox process. To obtain a wide range of wettability values with a small potential difference, we selected +0.40 V and −0.60 V as the optimal working oxidation and reduction potentials, respectively, based on the contact angle analysis at different potentials in Fig. 2b. Error bars represent the standard deviation from five independent measurements. c. Underwater wettability switching of oil on DPF during the cycle redox process. Error bars represent the standard deviation from five independent measurements. d, e. Analysis of the adhesion work between the functional liquid and the matrix in reduction state (d) and oxidation state (e): the polar part of the surface tension/energy and the corresponding surface tension/energy can be identified and the combination of them provides the optimum adhesion between DPF and functional liquid. The blue and red straight line represents the optimum adhesive force, and a range of acceptable performance can be proposed. From the results, one can conclude that the functional liquid falls in the optimum zone in the reduction state, which indicates that the affinity between the functional liquid and the matrix adheres well. f, g. 3D atomic force microscope (AFM) images show height variations on the surface of the matrix in reduction state (f) and oxidation state (g). AFM results suggest that the surface of the matrix changes from smooth to rough during the reduction process due to the influx of lithium ions49, which could also increase the hydrophilicity of the surface.

Extended Data Fig. 4 The SEM images of the filtrated DPM after backwashing.

a. DPM in oxidation state without liquid-lining; b. DPM from ELBS in oxidation state with liquid-lining; c. DPM in reduction state without liquid-lining; d. DPM from ELBS in reduction state with liquid-lining; Scale bar, 100 μm. After the backwashing, we can find that few particles exist on the liquid-lined matrix while many particles exist on the matrix without liquid, which demonstrate that the liquid-lining improves the anti-fouling property of the matrix. In addition, we can use the functional liquid to regulate the wettability of the matrix, which will influence the affinity among the contaminant, functional liquid, and matrix and further prevent particle accumulation. The surface of the matrix with liquid-lining in reduction state was cleaner than that in oxidation state, because of the stronger affinity between the lined liquid and the reduction state matrix. Therefore, we can apply different potentials to change the wettability of the matrix to reduce the affinity to further prevent particles accumulation. In addition, once the regulation is completed, the redox state of the liquid-based matrix can be maintained all the time without continuous power input.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Transport properties and microbubbles generation of ELBS.

a. Optical image of the pressure measurement setup. b. Schematic of the pressure-induced bulge of the liquid-air interface. Here, L is the pore size of DPM, R is the radius of the cylindrical fiber in DPM, Rsag is the critical radius of curvature of the liquid-air interface, θ is Young’s contact angle, ψ is the texture angle, δθ is the convex angle. c. Theoretical and experimental value of critical pressure (Pc) of air passing through ELBS with different pore size matrices during the redox process. The error bars represent the standard deviation from five independent measurements. d. The theoretical maximum and minimum and experimental diameters of microbubbles generated from ELBS with different matrix pore sizes in the redox process. Error bars represent the standard deviation from five independent measurements. e. The sizes of the microbubbles generated from ELBS with the average pore size of ~9.7 μm in the repeating redox process. Error bars represent the standard deviation from ten independent bubble measurements.

Extended Data Fig. 6 The air purification performance of the ELBS.

a. Adhesion of the hydrophobic particles to the gas–liquid interface. b. Representation of the forces acting on the hydrophobic particle at the bubble interface. Here, Rp is the radius of the particle, Rb is the radius of the bubble, FP is the force resulting from the capillary pressure inside the gas bubble, FB is the buoyancy force, FG is the gravitational force, Fγ is the surface tension force of the liquid. c. Optical image of the in situ study customized particulate matter (PM) purification system. d. The schematic of the purification system and the capture process of the droplets generated from the bursting bubbles. e. The particle size distribution in the liquid in the inlet side and outlet side. There are two purification steps: the direct interception and removal of larger PM in the polluted air by the liquid-lined porous matrix (inlet side), and the capture of smaller PM by the functional liquid through the microbubble interface (outlet side).

Extended Data Fig. 7

Optical photographs of DPM, SSP (stainless-steel plate), and SSM after immersed in 1.0 M NaOH solutions, 0.5 M H2SO4 solutions, 1.0 M NaCl solutions, at different temperatures for 24 h, respectively. Scale bar, 1 cm.

Extended Data Table 1 Inertial impaction of particles with different radius
Full size table
Extended Data Table 2 Brownian diffusion of particles with different radius
Full size table
Extended Data Table 3 The purification efficiency of ELBS with different heights of the functional liquid in different states
Full size table
Extended Data Table 4 Comparison of the purification performance between ELBS prepared in this work and other current filtration media7,50,51,52,53,54
Full size table

Supplementary information

Supplementary Video 1

In situ observation of PPy growing on SSM.

Supplementary Video 2

In situ observation of microbubble generation from ELBS. DPM is the working electrode, Au/SSM is the counter electrode, Ag/AgCl is the reference electrode and LiClO4 aqueous solution is the functional liquid.

Supplementary Video 3

Adhesion of different wettability particles to different gas–liquid interfaces.

Supplementary Video 4

Demonstration of using ELBS to absorb PM in a larger environment.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Han, Y., Ji, X. et al. Continuous air purification by aqueous interface filtration and absorption. Nature (2022). https://ift.tt/wh8Acz3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://ift.tt/wh8Acz3

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Adblock test (Why?)



"interface" - Google News
September 26, 2022 at 10:25PM
https://ift.tt/5NkDSg2

Continuous air purification by aqueous interface filtration and absorption - Nature.com
"interface" - Google News
https://ift.tt/G8VM1cO
https://ift.tt/pxFy46L

Bagikan Berita Ini

0 Response to "Continuous air purification by aqueous interface filtration and absorption - Nature.com"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Powered by Blogger.