A House impeachment manager acknowledged on Sunday that one reason for charging President Donald Trump with incitement of insurrection was to prevent the outgoing commander in chief from trying to become president again.
“One of the other purposes of impeachment in this case is to make sure that President Trump is not able to run for federal office again, that he’s not able to seek the presidency,” Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) told George Stephanopoulos on ABC’s “This Week.”
“The reason for that is that somebody who incited a riot, an attempted coup of the United States government, should not be president again,” he continued. “So it’s not just about making sure that there are consequences to his behavior. Certainly it’s that, but even after he’s left office, it’s also making sure that he can’t run for president again.”
Castro is one of the nine impeachment managers House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced last week, shortly before Democrats and 10 Republicans voted to impeach the president for inciting a deadly attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6. Led by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the lawmakers will serve as prosecutors in the looming impeachment trial in the Senate, which isn’t expected to begin until after Joe Biden is sworn in as president on Wednesday.
But interviews across the Sunday political talk shows indicate that the trial could serve as a referendum on whether Trump should be able to seek federal office again, a decision that could affect his grip on the party and reshape the future of the GOP.
“The Constitution, of course, talks about conviction, removal and disqualification from holding further public office,” Raskin told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “State of the Union.”
Raskin described Trump’s actions — the president falsely claimed for months that the election was stolen from him and even sought to pressure elections officials to overturn the results before encouraging a mob of supporters to march to the Capitol as Congress was set to certify the electoral count — as “the most serious presidential crime” in American history and “the most dangerous crime by a president ever committed against the United States.”
He argued that Congress shouldn’t set a precedent allowing outgoing presidents to incite insurrections to become dictators and avoid impeachment and conviction if the coup attempts are unsuccessful “because we just want to let bygones be bygones.”
“I’m not gonna lose my son at the end of 2020 and lose my country and my republic in 2021,” said Raskin, whose 25-year-old son, Tommy, died by suicide late last year. “It’s not gonna happen.”
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a top Trump ally, challenged Biden to call off Democrats’ pursuit of a conviction. Graham warned that the effort would further divide the country and show that Biden is “an incredibly weak figure.”
“And to my Republican colleagues in the Senate,” he told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, “if we embrace an unconstitutional impeachment of Donald Trump after he’s out of office, it will destroy the party.”
Democrats said it wasn’t clear when Pelosi would send the impeachment article to the Senate, and the impeachment managers wouldn’t reveal whether they planned to call witnesses.
Pelosi is still communicating with the Senate, Castro said, “but we'll be ready to go when it starts.”
Asked about the possibility of witnesses, Castro said, “We’re going to do whatever it takes to lay out the case.”
Raskin, however, maintained that all members of Congress were “witnesses” — and “victims.”
“Every senator who is a juror in this case is also a witness to these events,” he said. “I’m not gonna get into trial strategy, but I guess what I’m saying is, if you invade a police headquarters and you ransack and rampage the place and you kill officers and people working in the police headquarters, you don’t need a six-month investigation to determine what happened.”
Convicting Trump in the Senate will require a two-thirds vote. Once a trio of incoming Democrats are sworn in — Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff of Georgia and Alex Padilla of California — the chamber will be split 50-50, giving Democrats the majority with Vice President-elect Kamala Harris serving as the tiebreaker in split votes. That means it would take 17 Republican votes to convict Trump, assuming every Democrat supported conviction.
Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said he didn’t know where every member of the caucus stood on conviction or acquittal.
“We haven’t whipped it,” he said of Democratic leaders. “I would agree with Sen. [Mitch] McConnell in this respect: It is an issue of conscience. We will, of course, try to find out how members feel, but in terms of arm-twisting, when it comes to impeachment, we don’t do that.”
McConnell (R-Ky.), the majority leader, told his GOP colleagues in a note last week that he hadn’t determined how he would vote. “I intend to listen to the legal arguments when they are presented to the Senate,” he said.
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), another Trump ally, has said he wouldn’t vote to convict Trump because in his view it’s unconstitutional to convict a former president.
Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) told NBC’s Chuck Todd on “Meet the Press”: “I think that there is a lot of people who are going to express opinions with a great degree of certainty. We have policies and procedures, as well as a — one whole branch of government to be the referee on these things. I believe it is constitutionally dangerous not to proceed.”
Castro recognized the “high bar” required to convict a president — or, in this case, a soon-to-be former president.
“But our plan is to go after every single vote,” he said. “We want to make sure that every senator is standing up for this country, that every senator is considering the evidence against President Trump, and the fact that he incited a deadly insurrection. And so, we’re optimistic that when we lay out our case, we’ll be able to convince folks that, in fact, President Trump is responsible for inciting this deadly insurrection and that the Senate should convict.”
"again" - Google News
January 18, 2021 at 12:40AM
https://ift.tt/35P0aD2
Impeachment managers: Trial is referendum on Trump ever holding office again - POLITICO
"again" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2YsuQr6
https://ift.tt/2KUD1V2
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Impeachment managers: Trial is referendum on Trump ever holding office again - POLITICO"
Post a Comment