Abstract
Optoelectronic neural interfaces can leverage the photovoltaic effect to convert light into electrical current, inducing charge redistribution and enabling nerve stimulation. This method offers a non-genetic and remote approach for neuromodulation. Developing biodegradable and efficient optoelectronic neural interfaces is important for achieving transdermal stimulation while minimizing infection risks associated with device retrieval, thereby maximizing therapeutic outcomes. We propose a biodegradable, flexible, and miniaturized silicon-based neural interface capable of transdermal optoelectronic stimulation for neural modulation and nerve regeneration. Enhancing the device interface with thin-film molybdenum significantly improves the efficacy of neural stimulation. Our study demonstrates successful activation of the sciatic nerve in rodents and the facial nerve in rabbits. Moreover, transdermal optoelectronic stimulation accelerates the functional recovery of injured facial nerves.
Introduction
Implantable neural interfaces have been demonstrated for multiple therapeutic interventions1,2,3,4 targeting various neurological abnormalities, such as Parkinson’s syndrome5,6, epilepsy7,8, neuropathic pain9,10, overactive bladder11, depression12,13, and nerve injuries14,15, among others. Neural modulation based on direct electrical stimulation16,17,18 and drug-based techniques19,20 have been extensively studied. Conventional electrical stimulators have relatively large sizes and commonly necessitate connections to bulky batteries or external power supply equipment, potentially leading to undesired inflammations21. Recent endeavors in device miniaturization and integration with wireless circuits based on radio frequency (RF) and inductive coupling have shown promise in addressing these concerns15,22,23. Moreover, drug-based methods typically exhibit limited temporal resolution compared to electrical stimulations24. Other techniques, such as ultrasound25,26,27,28, magnetoelectronics29, and magnetism30, have also been explored to further achieve miniaturized and noninvasive or minimally invasive systems.
Optical interfaces represent one promising approach to achieving wireless neural stimulation without needing large-sized components. Given its high cellular specificity, optogenetics enables precise neural modulation and has been widely adopted in basic biomedical research31,32,33,34,35. However, the need for genetic modification constraints clinical translation. Alternatively, non-genetic optical neuromodulation has been proposed more recently, such as photothermal36,37,38,39, optoelectronic40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47 and photoacoustic systems48,49. Among these techniques, optoelectronic devices promise to achieve wireless and precise neural modulation without the need for excessive light intensity. These devices can convert light (red to near-infrared region 600-1000 nm) penetrated through tissues into electric currents and modulate neural activity via photocapacitive41,42,50 and/or photoelectrochemical45,51 effects. While optoelectronic implants have demonstrated the potential for in vivo nerve stimulation43,52,53 and ex vivo heart pacing52, there remain significant hurdles to overcome in order to achieve clinically relevant applications and maximize therapeutic outcomes. This is because in the context of short-term stimulation (typically ranging from a few days to a few weeks) targeted at temporary treatments like tissue regeneration and pain management, the use of devices becomes unnecessary upon the completion of tissue repair or the mitigation of symptoms. Biodegradable systems can therefore offer the advantages of eliminating unnecessary material retention and avoiding the requirement for secondary surgery to remove the device, thereby maximizing therapeutic outcomes. Recent demonstrated examples include biodegradable electrical stimulators for sciatic nerve regeneration15,54, pain management55, etc.
As silicon (Si) has demonstrated desirable biocompatibility and biodegradability56,57,58,59, devices based on Si membranes could offer potential solutions. However, interface decoration of Si devices with noble metals is often required to realize high power density, which would otherwise impede transdermal optoelectrical stimulation45,50. Electrical stimulation at the early stages of tissue injuries has been proven to effectively promote nerve regneration15,54,60,61. Electrical stimulation is believed to accelerate early Wallerian degeneration62, stimulate calcium activity which upregulates regeneration associated genes (RAGs) through the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) pathway63, and increase the proliferation and production of neurotrophic factors of Schwann cells60, promoting nerve regeneration. Effective transdermal optoelectronic stimulation could therefore potentially provide electrical cues wirelessly to facilitate nerve regrowth and functional restoration, which has been rarely explored. In all, optoelectronic devices that simultaneously satisfy full biodegradability and high stimulation efficacy for transdermal neural modulation and regeneration are yet to be developed. The biodegradable nature of the device can offer the unique advantage of eliminating retrieval procedures and minimizing associated infection risks.
Here, we propose a fully biodegradable, flexible and miniaturized optoelectronic device based on thin film Si diode and accomplish wireless transdermal stimulation and functional restoration of peripheral nerves (Fig. 1). The introduction of an interface modification layer of dissolvable molybdenum (Mo) enables highly efficient charge injection. Moreover, adopting extended electrodes allows a tripolar stimulation configuration to further assist stimulation64. Nerve activation is achieved by irradiating tissue-penetrating red light (635 nm) on the sciatic nerve of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and the facial nerve of New Zealand rabbit (Fig. 1). Successful functional recovery of injured facial nerves is achieved by transdermal optoelectronic stimulation. These results offer important avenues for developing of biodegradable, efficient, and miniaturized optoelectronic devices for transdermal neural modulation and associated regenerative medicine.
Results
Device structure and operational characteristics of the optoelectronic neural interface
One of the key challenges in achieving effective transdermal optoelectronic neural stimulation for optimal therapeutic outcomes is the development of biodegradable and efficient devices. While studies have suggested that metallic catalysts used to modify the surface of Si pn diodes can increase stimulation efficacy by facilitating capacitive and faradaic charge injections, with gold (Au) modification showing the most significant improvement43,50, the development of fully biodegradable interface modification materials has yet to be explored for Si diodes. Here, we hypothesize that the introduction of a thin biodegradable metallic decoration layer based on Mo can potentially offer a feasible solution.
The device consists of a thin film Si pn diodes (p+n, 2.5 μm), an interface modification layer (Mo, 10 nm) to achieve efficient charge injection, and an array of extended electrodes (Mo, 300 nm) to allow tripolar stimulation configuration (Fig. 1). The fabrication scheme is given in Supplementary Fig. 1. Specifically, thin film Si diodes (p+n, 2.5 μm) are made by p-doping of n-type silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers through ion-implantation. Thin films Si diodes are then patterned into miniaturized sizes (4 mm or 2 mm in diameter) by photolithography and reactive ion etching (RIE). The p+ side of Si diodes (p+n) is modified with a thin metallic layer (Mo or Au, 10 nm) by sputtering, to ensure high stimulation efficacy and sufficient light transparency. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) results of the modified p+ surface appear in Supplementary Fig. 2. Si diode membranes are picked up by heat release tape and transfer-printed onto a biodegradable and soft polymeric substrate (copolymer of poly(L-lactic acid) and poly(trimethylene carbonate), PLLA-PTMC, 200 µm) with an array of extended Mo electrodes (300 nm), to enable a tripolar-electrode configuration which is expected to enhance local potential difference and facilitate stimulation64. Moreover, the PLLA-PTMC substrate possesses Young’s modulus (1.45 ± 0.27 MPa) similar to neural tissues54, allowing minimal mechanical mismatch and conformal contact at the device/nerve interface. The n side of Si diodes (p+n) is placed in contact with neural tissues to perform stimulation, as n-type Si surfaces have successfully demonstrated light-evoked activation of peripheral nerves53.
The photograph of the biodegradable Si-based optoelectronic interface appears in Fig. 2a. We use a previously reported patch-clamp set-up for photoresponse measurement53, and the cross-sectional view of the device for measurement is given in Fig. 2b. The device is immersed in PBS, with the pipette positioned within 5 μm from the surface of the sample and a reference electrode in the PBS, mimicking in vivo conditions. As excellent photoresponse has been demonstrated by Si-based photovoltaic devices with deep red light65, photocurrents and photovoltages are recorded under the illumination of a pulsed red laser beam (635 nm, 10 Hz, pulse width of 10 ms, spot size of ~ 2 mm, adjustable light intensity by controlling the input current to the laser diode (Supplementary Fig. 3). Photovoltages are generated within the Si diode via photovoltaic response by the separation of charge carriers (electrons and holes) upon illumination66 (Fig. 2c). The photogenerated carriers can then migrate and accumulate at the Si surface and induce photocapacitive and/or photoelectrochemical effects. Specifically, on the n side of the Si diode (p+n), excessive electrons can lead to cell depolarization and stimulate action potentials of nerve tissues53. Holes on the p+ side are driven through the modification layer and extended electrodes which act as return electrodes to close the current path, enabling a tripolar electrode configuration (Fig. 1) that has been reported to improve stimulation efficacy43,64.
The representative photovoltage responses of Si diode with Mo modification layer (Si/Mo device) under illumination (0.95 W/cm2, safe for most tissues)52,67 is shown in Fig. 2d. A cathodic voltage transient is observed upon light irradiation followed by an anodic transient when light is off, corresponding to the charging and discharging of the device, which imitates a biphasic stimulation mode that can modulate the behavior of adjacent nerve tissues. The measurement is found to be sensitive to the position and distance from the electrodes as well as the amount of liquid in the system, and the conditions are kept similar to ensure consistent results. In addition, to identify the influence of photothermal effects on photoresponse measurement, we evaluate the changes in temperature upon pulsed laser illumination of the device surface by an infrared thermal imaging camera, and the results suggest negligible increase in surface temperature after 5 s of irradiation (635 nm, 10 Hz, pulse width 10 ms, 0.95 W/cm2) on the device that immersed in PBS (Supplementary Fig. 4a). We also simulate the transdermal condition by placing the Si/Mo device on the facial skin (~ 2 mm) of New Zealand rabbits with light incident from the back and passing through the skin. The result again indicates a minimal temperature increase of the device after 1 h of pulse laser illumination (Supplementary Fig. 4b).
To improve stimulation efficacy, the p+ side of the Si diode (p+n) is modified by a metallic layer. As the modification layer and extended electrodes are located on the back side of the device during in vivo applications, a thin modification layer (~ 10 nm) and a separated array of extended electrodes are employed to maintain desirable transparency, allowing light transmission to reach the Si diodes. To assess the effectiveness of the biodegradable modification layer, photoresponse is first evaluated with front-side illumination (Fig. 2b), excluding the influence that may be attributed to light transmission. Results with back-side illumination to demonstrate the potential effects of light absorption will be discussed later. We measure the photovoltage of Si diodes without modification layers (Si devices), Si diodes with a biodegradable Mo modification layer (Si/Mo devices), and Si diodes with a traditional Au modification layer (Si/Au devices), under the irradiation of continuous red pulsed laser beam with different light intensity (Fig. 2e). The results suggest a considerable enhancement in the photovoltage of Si/Mo and Si/Au devices compared to the devices without modification layers (Si devices). Mo modified device demonstrates the greatest photovoltage, which almost doubles the value of that of the Si/Au device. Moreover, the measured photovoltage increases with the increasing illumination intensity and reaches a plateau at light intensities greater than 0.95 W/cm2. It is noted that the measured photovoltage (~ 30 mV) is lower than the open-circuit voltage of a conventional photovoltaic Si diode (~ 300-500 mV)68, probably due to the presence of an additional device/solution interface. Nevertheless, photovoltage in the range of ~30 mV is expected to be sufficient for neural stimulation53. Figure 2f illustrates the corresponding measured photocurrents of Si, Si/Mo, and Si/Au devices upon laser irradiation (0.95 W/cm2) and the results demonstrate that Mo modified devices achieve the highest photocurrents, consistent with the measured photovoltages. In addition, the measured photoresponse demonstrates typical exponential transient decay, which is beneficial for efficient charge injection into the nerve and lowers the threshold for charge injection69,70.
The total injected charges, and the contribution of the faradaic charge and the capacitive charge can be determined from the photocurrent transients under the illumination period (Supplementary Fig. 5) following a previously reported method52. The results are summarized in Figs. 2g, 2h and 2i, and Si/Mo devices demonstrate the highest total injected charges with a greatly enhanced faradaic charge and capacitive charge. Specifically, for the Si and Si/Au devices, the faradaic charge represents merely 1%-2% of the overall injected charge, whereas in Si/Mo devices, it accounts for up to 30%. The increased faradaic component of Si/Mo devices could be attributed to the potential electrochemical reaction of Mo with multiple oxidation states, especially in the presence of the positive photovoltage on the Mo modified p+ side of the Si diode. Together with enhanced interface capacitive components, the presence of Mo decoration can significantly improve charge injection efficacy. Detailed characteristics of the Mo modification layer will be discussed in the following session. Both Si/Au and Si/Mo devices exhibit desirable stability over 12000 cycles of pulse laser irradiation (635 nm, 0.95 W/cm2, 10 Hz, pulse width 10 ms) (Supplementary Fig. 6a). The photocurrent of Si/Mo and Si/Au devices retain 94% (I/I0) and 84% of the initial optoelectronic current (I0) respectively, indicating a slightly lower retention current of the Si/Au device. This may arise from the adsorption of chloride ions on the surface of Au films71, which could influence their microstructure. Additionally, potential microscale delamination could also contribute, as Au thin films are known to exhibit poor adhesion to Si surfaces72,73.
For in vivo optoelectronic stimulation, light will be incident from the backside and transmitted through the semitransparent modification layer and reach the Si diode. The influence of light transmission is therefore investigated, and the results are given in Supplementary Fig. 6b, c. Around 44% and 67% light transmission is achieved for Mo and Au modification layers (~10 nm) at 635 nm, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 6b). The measured photovoltage is comparable with light illumination (0.95 W/cm2) from the front and the back (Supplementary Fig. 6c), which is consistent with results shown in Fig. 2e that desirable photovoltage can be sustained even with a certain level of light absorption as long as there is sufficient light intensity. These results suggest the feasibility of using the Mo modified Si diode as an effective optoelectronic interface for in vivo neural modification.
The degradation properties of Si-based optoelectronic devices are evaluated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) under accelerated conditions (65 °C). The photographs of the degradation process at different stages are shown in Fig. 2j. The results indicate that the metallic films dissolve first, while Si membranes gradually disintegrate and dissolve along with the swelling and hydrolysis of the polymeric PLLA-PTMC substrate, leading to complete degradation of the entire device in about 6 weeks.
Properties of interface modification layers
To further elucidate the characteristics of the interface modification layer on the photoresponse of the devices, we evaluate the cyclic voltammetry (CV) characteristics, impedance, and surface roughness of Mo and Au modification layers on the p+ side of the Si diode (p+n). The CV measurement is performed based on a 3-electrode configuration (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Mo or Au modified p+ surface of the Si-diode serves as the working electrode, PBS (pH 7.4) serves as the electrolyte, and platinum (Pt) and silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) are used as the counter electrode and reference electrodes respectively. The CV results suggest a significant increase in capacitance is associated with Mo modification layer (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 7). Mo modified surface also exhibits a low impedance at the lower range of frequency compared to the Au decorated or bare Si surface (Fig. 3b), indicating a lower charge transfer resistance at the device/solution interface. An equivalent circuit is proposed to analyze the impedance characteristics of the Mo and Au modified interface (Supplementary Fig. 8a), and the interface of Si/metallic film and metallic film/solution are considered as a parallel RC circuit, respectively. The fitting parameters in Supplementary Fig. 8b, c reveal that the charge transfer resistance at the metallic film/solution interface of Si/Mo devices (1480 Ω) is much lower compared with that of Si/Au devices (19604 Ω), probably due to more significant electrochemical reactions at the interface as Mo has multiple oxidation states, enabling efficient charge injection. In addition, the capacitance of Si/Mo devices (9.18 × 10−4 F) is greater compared with that of Si/Au (6.31 × 10−6 F), consistent with the CV results, which could be attributed to the pseudocapacitive behavior associated with potential electrochemical reactions of Mo74. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis is widely adopted for surface analysis of metallic thin films75,76. The XPS measurement of the surface of the Mo modification layer demonstrates slightly increased amounts of Mo4+ and Mo6+ after CV cycling (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 9a), suggesting the presence of potential oxidation. Moreover, the enhanced surface roughness of Si/Mo and Si/Au devices can also contribute to increased capacitance (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 9b, c). Based on these results, we speculate that the Mo decoration layer at the p+ side can potentially allow stronger electrochemical reactions at the device/solution interface and induce pseudocapacitive behavior, which is beneficial for efficient charge injection by improving both faradaic and capacitive contributions. Considering charge conservation, corresponding charge injection at the n side is expected to increase as well, promoting charge injection and thereby stimulation efficacy, through photocapacitive effects and/or associated electrochemical reactions. For example, reactive oxygen species (ROS) could be produced at the interface that modulates neural activity52,77. Nevertheless, the amount of potentially generated ROS could be minimal and was not detected in the current experiments.
Sciatic nerve modulation
As the biodegradable Mo modification layer can significantly promote photoresponse of Si diodes, we first study the modulation of the sciatic nerve of SD rats with open surgery to evaluate the stimulation efficacy of the biodegradable optoelectronic device, by monitoring the acute response upon light illumination (Fig. 4a). During our experiments, we record compound muscle action potential (CMAP) of gastrocnemius muscles using dual muscle electrodes and capture limb movement displacements using a video camera. The flexible neural interface enables conformal contact on the sciatic nerves (Fig. 4b), without sutures or bio-glues. Irradiating the sciatic nerves with a red laser beam (635 nm, 10 Hz, 10 ms pulse width, spot size of ~2 mm) induces their excitation, leading to the contraction of associated muscles triggering movement in the right hind limb (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Movie 1). We investigated the CMAP amplitude (peak-peak value) of gastrocnemius muscles which are innervated by the sciatic nerve, under varying light intensities using the 4 mm diameter optoelectronic device (Fig. 4d). The results demonstrated that CMAP amplitudes increased with higher light intensities, reaching a plateau at 0.95 W/cm2. This correlation is consistent with the patch-clamp measurement (Fig. 2e). Furthermore, the CMAPs amplitude and limb movement displacements induced by Si/Mo devices are significantly greater than those of Si/Au devices at the same light intensity (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Mov. 1), indicating a highly efficient neural stimulation triggered by the Si/Mo device. By contrast, direct laser irradiation or Si device without interface modification can barely activate the sciatic nerve (Fig. 4e). It is noted that successful stimulation of sciatic nerves with Si devices has been achieved in C57BL/6 mice53, possibly due to the lower threshold voltage for sciatic nerve stimulation in C57BL/6 mice compared with SD rats used in the current study. With improved stimulation efficacy by Mo decoration, nerve activation can be accomplished on the sciatic nerve of SD rats. We also study neural stimulation using devices with smaller sizes (2 mm in diameter), and the evoked CMAPs and measured photovoltage with different illumination intensities are given in Fig. 4f and Supplementary Fig. 10, respectively. Although a decrease in photoresponse is observed with smaller device sizes, Si/Mo devices (2 mm) can still elicit CMAP, suggesting a potential increase in spatial resolution for neuromodulation. By contrast, Si/Au devices (2 mm) are unable to activate the sciatic nerve (Fig. 4e). The CMAP amplitudes and associated limb displacements of Si/Mo and Si/Au devices under laser irradiation (0.95 W/cm2) are summarized in Fig. 4g and h respectively. The results suggest that the presence of Mo modification layer enables CMAP amplitudes up to ~ 9 mV and limb displacement up to ~ 16 mm. The achieved limb movement surpasses previously reported Si-based flexible optoelectronic devices under similar light intensity52,53, indicating improved stimulation efficacy. This is probably due to the efficient charge injection induced by Mo decoration by improving both the faradaic and capacitive contribution. Photovoltage is produced in the Si diode under illumination via photovoltaic response, and electrons accumulated at the n side of the Si diode result in cell depolarization and initiate action potentials through photocapacitive and/or photoelectrochemical effects, while holes on the p+ side of the Si diode are transported through the modification layer and extended electrodes to complete the current path. The presence of Mo modification layer could allow more effective charge injection through associated electrochemical reactions, enabling significantly improved stimulation efficacy.
Transdermal facial nerve modulation and regeneration
As Mo modified devices demonstrate desirable stimulation efficacy, which could potentially enable transdermal neural modulation with fully biodegradable devices in larger animals, we further study the feasibility of transdermal biomodulation of facial nerves of New Zealand rabbits. Compared to sciatic nerves, facial nerves are located closer to the skin surface, resulting in reduced absorption and scattering of penetrating light, greatly facilitating the successful implementation of transdermal optoelectronic stimulation. Facial nerve injuries often occur during surgery in the head region78, and can lead to paralysis of the facial muscles and cause facial palsy. Optoelectronic stimulation could potentially provide electrical cues to facilitate tissue regeneration and functional restoration79,80. Although facial nerves are more accessible to tissue-penetrating light compared to sciatic nerves, there has rarely been attention to the use of optoelectronic stimulation in facial nerve phototherapy, probably due to the unavailability of biodegradable miniaturized optoelectronic devices with optimal stimulation efficacy81,82. We first investigate the evoked CMAP amplitudes of the facial nerves of New Zealand rabbits in comparison to the sciatic nerves of SD rats under different stimulation currents using conventional electrodes (Supplementary Fig. 11a). The results suggest that, compared to the sciatic nerve of SD rats, the facial nerve of New Zealand rabbits produces weaker muscle responses at the same stimulation current intensity. This is likely because the sciatic nerve in SD rats innervates a much larger muscle group with a greater volume83,84. As absorption and scattering can reduce light intensity when penetrating through tissues85, we study the photoresponse under transdermal illumination conditions by placing a skin sample between incident light and the optoelectronic device (Fig. 5a, b). We monitor the output light intensity penetrated through the skin sample (Fig. 5c), and the results demonstrate a ~ 50% reduction in light intensity. The measured photovoltage of the Si/Mo devices through the skin is reduced by ~ 30% due to the decrease in penetrated light intensity caused by the absorption of the skin, separated extended electrodes, and the modification layer (Fig. 5d).
As shown in Figs. 5e and 5f, the flexible optoelectronic device enables conformal contact with the facial nerve, ensuring a desirable device/nerve interface. When subjected to laser irradiation (635 nm, 10 Hz, 10 ms pulse width, 2 mm spot size, 0.95 W/cm2), the Si and Si/Au devices barely elicit activation of the facial nerve even without skin coverage (Fig. 5g). By contrast, the Si/Mo devices successfully induce CMAPs under transdermal illumination (Fig. 5g). It is noted that the measured CMAP amplitude is much smaller compared to that measured on the sciatic nerve of SD rats, consistent with the results presented in Supplementary Fig. 11a. We investigate the biodegradability of the Si/Mo optoelectronic devices after implanted at the facial nerve (Fig. 5h). The device maintains its integrity and remains in contact with the nerve after implantation of 4 days (Fig. 5h and Supplementary Fig. 11b), and the photovoltage of the retrieved device remain ~ 30% of the initial photoresponse after 6 days of implantation (Supplementary Fig. 11c). The PLLA-PTMC polymeric substrate of the devices exhibits great reduction in size through hydrolysis after 4 weeks of implantation (Fig. 5h), and the device completely degrades after 8 weeks of implantation, indicating full biodegradation in vivo (Fig. 5h).
With desirable transdermal photoresponse and biodegradability of Si/Mo devices, we further investigate potential optoelectronic therapy for tissue repair and function restoration of facial nerves, as research has demonstrated that electrical cues at the initial stage (first few days) after injury can considerably accelerate the process of peripheral nerve regeneration54,61,86. As approximately 60% of facial nerve injuries are non-truncated (contusions, compressions, partial avulsions)87, we investigate facial nerves with crush injuries and assess the efficacy of neural stimulation using the biodegradable optoelectronic device to promote functional recovery.
The rabbit facial tissue is carefully dissected to fully expose the facial nerve, followed by the creation of a crush injury (Supplementary Fig. 11d). The fully biodegradable and flexible Si/Mo optoelectronic device is conformably attached to the injured site, followed by suturing of the skin tissue and demarcating the implantation site by makers of surgical sutures. Phototherapy is applied 1-h daily for 1 or 4 consecutive days, with transdermal irradiation (635 nm, 10 Hz, 10 ms pulse width, 0.95 W/cm2, spot size ~ 2 mm). The average power density of the pulsed laser (0.19 W/cm2) employed in the current studies falls within the skin exposure limit (0.2 W/cm2)88, suggesting minimal adverse effects. To evaluate the efficacy of optoelectronic stimulation, studies are performed for 5 groups: (i) implantation of Si/Mo devices with optoelectronic stimulation for 4 days (Si/Mo OS-4d); (ii) implantation of Si/Mo devices with optoelectronic stimulation for 1 day (Si/Mo OS-1d); (iii) implantation of Si devices (no modification layer) with optoelectronic stimulation for 4 days (Si OS-4d); (iv) Photostimulation without optoelectronic devices for 4 days (PS-4d); and (v) no treatment (control).
Regenerated nerve segments are harvested at 4 weeks and 8 weeks postoperative, and are subjected to tissue sectioning and immunofluorescence staining to evaluate tissue regrowth. The immunofluorescence staining images of the longitudinally sectioned nerve segments located 5 mm distal from the crush sites at 4 weeks postoperatively suggest that, greater number of directional axons denoted by both GAP-43 and NF200 (green fluorescence) is observed in the Si/Mo OS-4d group compared with the other groups (Fig. 6a, b and Supplementary Fig. 12). Moreover, the density of myelin sheaths denoted by MBP (red fluorescence) surrounding the nerve fibers (NF200, green fluorescence) is also greater in the Si/Mo OS-4d group compared to the other groups (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Fig. 12a). Furthermore, the immunofluorescence staining images of transversely sectioned nerve segments located 10 mm distal from the crush sites at 8 weeks postoperatively (Fig. 6c) indicate that, myelination in the Si/Mo OS-4d and Si/Mo OS-1d groups is more mature than the other groups, in the sense that the presence of fluorescent signals of myelin sheaths (MBP, red fluorescence) are greater surrounding the nerve fascicles regions, indicating a more profound and expedited process of myelination. These results provide evidence of the beneficial effects of the biodegradable optoelectronic neural interface for facial nerve regeneration. In addition, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining images are illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 13 (4 weeks) and Supplementary Fig. 14 (8 weeks), indicating no significant inflammation.
To evaluate the restoration of nerve conduction function, a two-electrode current stimulator is positioned proximal to the site of nerve injury at 4 weeks and 8 postoperatively. A single current stimulation of 3 mA (pulse width 2 μs) is subsequently applied using electrophysiological equipment, and the resulting CMAPs generated at the target muscle are recorded. The amplitude and latency of CMAPs are assessed as a measure of nerve conduction recovery. The CMAP data at 4 weeks postoperatively demonstrate relatively large variation, probably due to incomplete tissue regeneration and re-innervation to the target muscles at such an early stage. Nevertheless, more instances of greater CMAP amplitudes are observed in the Si/Mo OS-4d and Si/Mo OS-1d groups, suggesting a greater chance of faster nerve re-innervation. Statistically, the measured CMAP amplitude (peak-peak value) at 4 weeks postoperatively is significantly greater in the Si/Mo OS-4d and Si/Mo OS-1d groups (p < 0.01 or p < 0.05) as compared to the other groups (Supplementary Fig. 15a). The latency of the Si/Mo OS-4d and Si/Mo OS-1d groups are lower compared to the Si OS-4d group (p < 0.001), and the latency of the Si/Mo OS-1d group is lower than that of the Control and PS-4d groups (p < 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. 15b). At 8 weeks postimplantation when nerve regeneration has progressed to a more mature stage, the Si/Mo OS-4d group exhibits significantly greater amplitude compared to the control, PS-4d, Si OS-4d and Si/Mo OS-1d groups (p < 0.001) (Fig. 6e), and the amplitude is approaching that of the normal side (wild-type, WT). The Si/Mo OS-1d group also demonstrates significantly greater CMAP amplitude compared with the control (p < 0.01) and Si OS-4d groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference in latency is observed among the Si/Mo OS-4d and Si/Mo OS-1d groups compared to the WT, control and Si OS-4d groups (Fig. 6f). The CMAP and immunohistochemical results suggest that the Mo modified optoelectronic device can efficiently promote reinnervation following nerve injuries.
The enhancement of long-term axonal growth through electrical stimulation in the early recovery phase may be attributed to the expedited Wallerian degeneration62 and the prompt and continuous upregulation of regeneration associated genes60,89, which accelerates staggered regeneration of axons across the injury site and therefore facilitates more rapid axonal regrowth. We assess the degree of degeneration of myelinated axons 7 days postimplantation of the control and Si/Mo OS-4d groups. Toluidine blue staining and TEM analysis of the transversely sectioned nerve segments, located 10 mm distal from the crush site on day 7 postoperatively are given in Supplementary Fig. 16. In the control group, a substantial amount of degenerating myelinated axons (marked by the yellow arrow) and some intact myelinated axons (marked by the red arrow) are observed. In contrast, in the Si/Mo OS-4d group, axonal degeneration is more advanced, evidenced by the greater clearance of myelin and axons, resulting in significantly fewer degenerating myelinated nerve fibers and few intact axons. The statistical results show significantly less density of myelinated nerve fibers (including both degenerating and intact axons) in the Si/Mo OS-4d group compared with the control group (p < 0.01), based on the toluidine blue staining images. The results are consistent with the previous report62 suggesting a 4-day optoelectronic stimulation at the early phase could accelerate Wallerian degeneration, and thereby creating a more favorable microenvironment for nerve regrowth. Collectively, these results suggest that the fully biodegradable Si based optoelectronic device with Mo decoration can effectively modulate nerve activity and facilitate functional recovery by providing electrical cues at the initial state of nerve injuries.
Discussion
Herein, we propose a fully biodegradable, flexible and miniaturized Si-based neural interface that achieves transdermal optoelectronic stimulation and regeneration of peripheral nerves. Dissolvable Mo decoration at the device interface enables significantly enhanced charge injection and efficient neural stimulation. Successful activation of the sciatic nerve in SD rats and the facial nerve in New Zealand rabbits is demonstrated. Furthermore, accelerated tissue repair and functional recovery of injured facial nerve is accomplished in New Zealand rabbits through transdermal optoelectronic stimulation. The entire device is bioresorbable in vivo, eliminating the need for retrieval surgery and, therefore, minimizing associated infection risks. Further studies of encapsulation strategies could enable a more controllable operational time frame. Combined with a more sophisticated device structure with extended leads or implantable fibers for light delivery, optoelectronic stimulation at deeper tissue may be possible. Applicable scenarios could also be extended to other nervous systems with proper device optimization, including the vagus nerve, spinal cord, retinal neurons, etc. Overall, this work offers materials strategies and device schemes to achieve highly efficient and biodegradable optoelectronic neural interfaces for non-genetic, wireless, and transdermal neural modulation and regeneration, with potential use in clinical medicine for maximized therapeutic outcomes.
Methods
Device fabrication
PLLA-PTMC films are prepared by drop casting. The PLLA-PTMC solution is obtained by dissolving PLLA-PTMC particles (60:40 Jinan Daigang Biomaterials Co., Ltd., China) in chloroform (analytical pure, Beijing Tongguang Chemical Co., Ltd., China) at a mass/volume ratio of 1:10. Then 4 mL of the solution is drop-casted onto glass substrates and cured at 4 °C for 12 h. After solvent evaporation, PLLA-PTMC films (thickness ~ 200 μm) are obtained. Shadow masks with the pattern of electrode arrays (line width 300 μm, pitch 700 μm) are then adhered to the PLLA-PTMC surface, followed by deposition of extended electrodes (Mo or Au, 300 nm) using magnetron sputtering.
SOI wafers (device layer: n-type, 100 crystal orientation, resistivity 1–10 Ω·cm, thickness 2.5 μm) were purchased (Beijing Topvendor, China). Vertical Si diodes (p+n) are achieved by ion implantation. Boron (B) was implanted into the n-type Si (doping concentration of 4 × 1014/cm2) under injection energy of 30 keV and then annealed at 950 °C for 30 min for dopant activation. Si diodes are patterned into miniaturized sizes (2 mm or 4 mm in diameter) by photolithography and reactive ion etching. The buried oxide layer in the SOI is removed using HF solution (concentration 40%, ACS grade, Aladdin, China) and thin film Si diodes (2.5 μm) are released. Next, modification layers (Mo or Au, 10 nm) are deposited on the p+ side of Si diodes using magnetron sputtering, and then modified Si diodes are transferred to the surface of the PLLA-PTMC substrates with deposited extended electrodes using a hot release tape, where the modified p+ side of the Si diodes is in contact with extended electrodes which functions as return electrodes.
Optoelectronic characterization of the device
The device is immersed in a PBS solution, and a standard patch-clamp system is used to measure the photoresponse of the optoelectronic device. A red laser beam (635 nm laser, 10 Hz, pulse width of 10 ms, spot size of 2 mm) is incident on the device through a collimating lens, and its irradiation intensity is controlled by managing the input current of a laser diode. Voltage- and current-clamp protocols are performed by a p-Clamp software-controlled (Molecular Devices) Axonpatch 200B amplifier. A glass pipette (~ 1 MΩ) loaded with PBS solution approached the device surface within a distance of 5 μm. And voltage- or current- clamp (filtered at 10 kHz and sampled at 200 kHz) is used to record the transient photoresponse of the device. We measure the photovoltage of Si diodes without modification layers (Si devices), Si diodes with a biodegradable Mo modification layer (Si/Mo devices), and Si diodes with a traditional Au modification layer (Si/Au devices). It is noted that extended electrodes are not present for devices without modification layers (Si devices).
Characterization of device degradation
Degradation experiments were conducted by immersing the Si/Mo device in PBS solution (pH 7.4), with daily replacement of the PBS solution, which is maintained at 65 °C using a water bath. Optical images were recorded at various stages.
Electrochemical characterizations of the optoelectronic device
CV and EIS tests were performed using a potentiostat (CHI650, Chenhua, China). A three-electrode system was adopted. PBS served as the electrolyte, the Si diode (p+n, on SOI) with or without modification layers served as the working electrode (with an area of 1 cm2), Ag/AgCl was used as the reference electrode, and the mesh Pt electrode (with an area of 1 cm2) was used as the counter electrode. 300 nm of Au is sputtered on the top part of the Si diode as the electrical contact for measurement. CV curves were measured at a scan rate of 0.025 V/s and a potential range from -0.4 V to 0.4 V. EIS measurements were performed from 1 Hz to 0.1 MHz.
Characterization of material morphology
The surface morphology of the material was observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Zeiss, Berlin, Germany) and the elemental composition was analyzed by energy spectrometry (EDS). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (250XI, Thermo Fisher, England) was used to analyze the surface chemistry of Mo modification layer. A Bruker Dimension Icon microscope with a ScanAsyst probe in automated peak force tapping mode was used for atomic force microscopy (AFM) characterization. Nano scope analysis 1.9 software was used to remove scars from the scans, crop the scan area and plot the three-dimensional morphology of the material surface.
Characterization of photothermal effects
An infrared thermal imaging camera (220 S, Fotric, China) was used to monitor the temperature change of the device after illumination. The facial skin of rabbits was placed in a transparent glass dish with the appropriate amount of saline, and Si/Mo device was placed on the skin. Pulsed light (635 nm laser, 10 Hz, pulse width of 10 ms, spot size of 2 mm) was incident from the back side of the skin, and the temperature change is recorded by the camera.
Acute sciatic nerve stimulation
All procedures associated with the animal studies are in accordance with the institutional guidelines of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. The experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional animal care and use committee at the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China (approval number 2016-x9-07). All SD rats were anesthetized through the intraperitoneal injection of a 1% solution of sodium pentobarbital at a dose of 0.3 ml/100 g body weight, and the hair on the right femur was subsequently removed. An incision was made across the midline of the skin, and the fascial plane was opened between the gluteus maximus and the anterior head of the biceps femoris, thereby exposing the sciatic nerve. Attaching the optoelectronic devices to sciatic nerves, and parallel recording electrodes were placed on the gastrocnemius muscle to record CMAPs. The movement of the right hind limb is recorded by a camera.
Acute facial nerve stimulation
The New Zealand rabbits were weighed and subsequently anesthetized through the intramuscular injection of a combination of Zoletil 50 and Xylazine (Zoletil + Xylazine) at a dose of 0.8 ml/kg. An incision was made in the right cheek and the subcutaneous fascia was separated to isolate the nerve from the surrounding tissue and blood vessels. The buccal branch of the facial nerve was then exposed and the optoelectronic device was attached to the nerve. Then parallel recording electrodes were placed on the target muscle in the face to record the CMAPs evoked by the optoelectronic device.
Functional restoration of facial nerve injury in rabbits
The experimental protocol received approval from the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of PLA General Hospital (approval number: 2016-x9-07). All animal-related procedures were conducted in line with the institutional guidelines of PLA General Hospital. Forty New Zealand Large White rabbits (no distinction between male and female), aged 3 months and weight between 2 and 2.2 kg, were selected for the study. The rabbits were subsequently anesthetized through the intramuscular injection of a combination of Zoletil 50 and Xylazine (Zoletil + Xylazine) at a dose of 0.8 ml/kg. The right face of the animal was disinfected with iodophor in preparation for all surgical procedures, which were performed under aseptic operating conditions by two surgeons. An incision was made in the right cheek and the subcutaneous fascia was separated to isolate the nerve from the surrounding tissue and blood vessels. The procedure involved exposing the buccal branch of the facial nerve and inducing crush injuries by clamping the nerve twice with toothless hemostatic forceps for 30 seconds, with 10-second intervals between clamps. The hemostat’s ring handles have a ratcheted locking mechanism that secures the jaws in a fixed position. We utilize the same position of the jaws of the hemostat to create crush injuries and employ the ratchet mechanism to lock the jaws in identical positions, ensuring consistent force and therefore reproducible degree of injuries for each experiment. Then the optoelectronic devices were implanted and attached to the injured nerve. After the procedure, the wound was closed sequentially, disinfected and the rabbits were fed normally. Phototherapy was applied 1-h daily for 1 or 4 days (635 nm, 10 Hz, pulse width 10 ms). The following groups are investigated (n = 4): Control (no treatment), PS-4d (photostimulation for 4 days), Si OS-4d (optoelectronic stimulation for 4 days with Si devices), Si/Mo OS-1d (optoelectronic stimulation for 1 day with Si/Mo devices), Si/Mo OS-4d (optoelectronic stimulation for 4 days with Si/Mo devices).
Electrophysiology assessment
At 4 and 8 weeks postimplantation, rabbits were weighed and anesthetized through the intramuscular injection of a combination of Zoletil 50 and Xylazine (Zoletil + Xylazine) at a dose of 0.8 ml/kg. A complete dissection was conducted to expose both the right facial nerve bridge and the normal facial nerve on the left side. Synergy electromyography (Oxford, USA) stimulating electrodes were placed on the proximal nerve stump, and parallel recording electrodes were placed on the facial target muscle. The stimulation current was set to 3 mA (pulse width ~ 2 μs), and CMAPs were recorded for a single stimulation. CMAPs were also measured on the left side with normal functions which are denoted as the WT group. The delay time (latency time) and peak–peak value (amplitude) of the CMAP on the injured/unoperated side were analyzed and derived for each group (n = 4). Latency time: the period from the electrical stimulation to the onset of the first significant signal peak. Amplitude: the value of the peak minus the trough in a complete waveform.
Immunohistochemical and historical assessment of nerve tissues
At weeks 4 and 8 postoperatively, animals were sacrificed via intramuscular injection of an overdose of Zoletil 50 and Xylazine (Zoletil + Xylazine) in each group. The regenerated nerve segments were immediately removed, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (ten times the sample volume) at 4 °C for 24 h, dehydrated in sunken sugar, embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound gel, and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The nerve grafts were cut into longitudinal sections (week 4) or transverse sections (week 8) with a thickness of 10 μm. The samples were randomly divided into two groups: one for immunofluorescent staining (using NF-200, S-100, GAP-43, MBP and DAPI) and the other for H&E staining (n = 4). Transversely sectioned nerve segments on day 7 postoperatively were evaluated with toluidine blue (TB) staining and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (n = 3).
Statistical data
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Data were statistically analyzed by the SPSS software package (version 23.0), accompanied by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
-
Mickle, A. D. et al. A wireless closed-loop system for optogenetic peripheral neuromodulation. Nature 565, 361–365 (2019).
-
Wenger, N. et al. Spatiotemporal neuromodulation therapies engaging muscle synergies improve motor control after spinal cord injury. Nat. Med. 22, 138–145 (2016).
-
Cotero, V. et al. Noninvasive sub-organ ultrasound stimulation for targeted neuromodulation. Nat. Commun. 10, 952 (2019).
-
Rowald, A. et al. Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysis. Nat. Med. 28, 260–271 (2022).
-
Rahimpour, S. et al. Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s disease: invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation. Neuromodulation: Technol. Neural Interface 24, 829–842 (2021).
-
Beuter, A., Lefaucheur, J.-P. & Modolo, J. Closed-loop cortical neuromodulation in Parkinson’s disease: an alternative to deep brain stimulation? Clin. Neurophysiol. 125, 874–885 (2014).
-
Panebianco, M., Zavanone, C., Dupont, S., Restivo, D. A. & Pavone, A. Vagus nerve stimulation therapy in partial epilepsy: a review. Acta Neurologica Belgica 116, 241–248 (2016).
-
Cagnan, H., Denison, T., McIntyre, C. & Brown, P. Emerging technologies for improved deep brain stimulation. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1024–1033 (2019).
-
Yu, K., Niu, X. & He, B. Neuromodulation management of chronic neuropathic pain in the central nervous system. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1908999 (2020).
-
Olmsted, Z. T. et al. Recommendations for Neuromodulation in Diabetic Neuropathic Pain. Front. Pain Res. 2, 726308 (2021).
-
Tilborghs, S. & De Wachter, S. Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of overactive bladder: systematic review and future prospects. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 19, 161–187 (2022).
-
Scangos, K. W. et al. Closed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression. Nat. Med. 27, 1696–1700 (2021).
-
Lefebvre-Demers, M., Doyon, N. & Fecteau, S. Non-invasive neuromodulation for tinnitus: A meta-analysis and modeling studies. Brain Stimulation 14, 113–128 (2021).
-
Choi, Y. S. et al. Stretchable, dynamic covalent polymers for soft, long-lived bioresorbable electronic stimulators designed to facilitate neuromuscular regeneration. Nat. Commun. 11, 5990 (2020).
-
Koo, J. et al. Wireless bioresorbable electronic system enables sustained nonpharmacological neuroregenerative therapy. Nat. Med. 24, 1830–1836 (2018).
-
Yuan, H. & Silberstein, S. D. Vagus nerve and vagus nerve stimulation, a comprehensive review: Part II. Headache.: J. Head. Face Pain. 56, 259–266 (2016).
-
Terutsuki, D. et al. Totally organic hydrogel-based self-closing cuff electrode for vagus nerve stimulation. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 11, 2201627 (2022).
-
Nag, S. & Thakor, N. V. Implantable neurotechnologies: electrical stimulation and applications. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 54, 63–76 (2016).
-
Dmitriev, A. et al. Prediction of severity of drug-drug interactions caused by enzyme inhibition and activation. Molecules 24, 3955 (2019).
-
Athauda, D. & Foltynie, T. Drug repurposing in Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs 32, 747–761 (2018).
-
Kozai, T. D. Y., Jaquins-Gerstl, A. S., Vazquez, A. L., Michael, A. C. & Cui, X. T. Brain tissue responses to neural implants impact signal sensitivity and intervention strategies. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 6, 48–67 (2015).
-
Singer, A. & Robinson, J. T. Wireless power delivery techniques for miniature implantable bioelectronics. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2100664 (2021).
-
Woodington, B. J. et al. Electronics with shape actuation for minimally invasive spinal cord stimulation. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg7833 (2021).
-
Koo, J. et al. Wirelessly controlled, bioresorbable drug delivery device with active valves that exploit electrochemically triggered crevice corrosion. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb1093 (2020).
-
Lee, H. J., Choi, N., Yoon, E.-S. & Cho, I.-J. MEMS devices for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 128, 132–147 (2018).
-
Larson, C. E. & Meng, E. A review for the peripheral nerve interface designer. J. Neurosci. Methods 332, 108523 (2020).
-
Blackmore, J., Shrivastava, S., Sallet, J., Butler, C. R. & Cleveland, R. O. Ultrasound neuromodulation: a review of results, mechanisms and safety. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 45, 1509–1536 (2019).
-
Tufail, Y., Yoshihiro, A., Pati, S., Li, M. M. & Tyler, W. J. Ultrasonic neuromodulation by brain stimulation with transcranial ultrasound. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1453–1470 (2011).
-
Singer, A. et al. Magnetoelectric materials for miniature, wireless neural stimulation at therapeutic frequencies. Neuron 107, 631–643.e635 (2020).
-
Christiansen, M. G., Senko, A. W. & Anikeeva, P. Magnetic strategies for nervous system control. Annu Rev. Neurosci. 42, 271–293 (2019).
-
Li, L. et al. Colocalized, bidirectional optogenetic modulations in freely behaving mice with a wireless dual-color optoelectronic probe. Nat. Commun. 13, 839 (2022).
-
Maimon, B. E., Sparks, K., Srinivasan, S., Zorzos, A. N. & Herr, H. M. Spectrally distinct channelrhodopsins for two-colour optogenetic peripheral nerve stimulation. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 485–496 (2018).
-
Deisseroth, K. Optogenetics. Nat. Methods 8, 26–29 (2011).
-
Boyden, E. S. Optogenetics and the future of neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1200–1201 (2015).
-
Pastrana, E. Optogenetics: controlling cell function with light. Nat. Methods 8, 24–25 (2011).
-
Duke, A. R. et al. Transient and selective suppression of neural activity with infrared light. Sci. Rep. 3, 2600 (2013).
-
Carvalho-de-Souza, JoãoL. et al. Photosensitivity of neurons enabled by cell-targeted gold nanoparticles. Neuron 86, 207–217 (2015).
-
Yoo, S., Park, J.-H. & Nam, Y. Single-cell photothermal neuromodulation for functional mapping of neural networks. ACS Nano 13, 544–551 (2019).
-
Martino, N. et al. Photothermal cellular stimulation in functional bio-polymer interfaces. Sci. Rep. 5, 8911 (2015).
-
Ghezzi, D. et al. A polymer optoelectronic interface restores light sensitivity in blind rat retinas. Nat. Photonics 7, 400–406 (2013).
-
Rand, D. et al. Direct electrical neurostimulation with organic pigment photocapacitors. Adv. Mater. 30, 1707292 (2018).
-
Jakešová, M. et al. Optoelectronic control of single cells using organic photocapacitors. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav5265 (2023).
-
Silverå Ejneby, M. et al. Chronic electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves via deep-red light transduced by an implanted organic photocapacitor. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 741–753 (2022).
-
Airaghi Leccardi, M. J. I. et al. Photovoltaic organic interface for neuronal stimulation in the near-infrared. Commun. Mater. 1, 21 (2020).
-
Parameswaran, R. et al. Photoelectrochemical modulation of neuronal activity with free-standing coaxial silicon nanowires. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 260–266 (2018).
-
Han, M. et al. Organic photovoltaic pseudocapacitors for neurostimulation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 42997–43008 (2020).
-
Han, M. et al. Photovoltaic neurointerface based on aluminum antimonide nanocrystals. Commun. Mater. 2, 19 (2021).
-
Shi, L. et al. Non-genetic photoacoustic stimulation of single neurons by a tapered fiber optoacoustic emitter. Light.: Sci. Appl. 10, 143 (2021).
-
Jiang, Y. et al. Neural stimulation in vitro and in vivo by photoacoustic nanotransducers. Matter 4, 654–674 (2021).
-
Jiang, Y. et al. Rational design of silicon structures for optically controlled multiscale biointerfaces. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 508–521 (2018).
-
Tang, J. et al. Nanowire arrays restore vision in blind mice. Nat. Commun. 9, 786 (2018).
-
Prominski, A. et al. Porosity-based heterojunctions enable leadless optoelectronic modulation of tissues. Nat. Mater. 21, 647–655 (2022).
-
Huang, Y. et al. Bioresorbable thin-film silicon diodes for the optoelectronic excitation and inhibition of neural activities. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 486–498 (2023).
-
Wang, L. et al. A fully biodegradable and self-electrified device for neuroregenerative medicine. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc6686 (2020).
-
Lee, G. et al. A bioresorbable peripheral nerve stimulator for electronic pain block. Sci. Adv. 8, eabp9169 (2022).
-
Hwang, S.-W. et al. A physically transient form of silicon electronics. Science 337, 1640–1644 (2012).
-
Wang, L. et al. Geometrical and chemical-dependent hydrolysis mechanisms of silicon nanomembranes for biodegradable electronics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 18013–18023 (2019).
-
Kang, S.-K. et al. Bioresorbable silicon electronic sensors for the brain. Nature 530, 71–76 (2016).
-
Yu, K. J. et al. Bioresorbable silicon electronics for transient spatiotemporal mapping of electrical activity from the cerebral cortex. Nat. Mater. 15, 782–791 (2016).
-
Javeed, S., Faraji, A. H., Dy, C., Ray, W. Z. & MacEwan, M. R. Application of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve regeneration: Stimulation parameters and future horizons. Interdiscip. Neurosurg. 24, 101117 (2021).
-
Abdulhakeem, A. A.-M., Catherine, M. N., Thomas, M. B. & Tessa, G. Brief electrical stimulation promotes the speed and accuracy of motor axonal regeneration. J. Neurosci. 20, 2602 (2000).
-
Li, X. et al. Electrical stimulation accelerates Wallerian degeneration and promotes nerve regeneration after sciatic nerve injury. Glia 71, 758–774 (2023).
-
Zuo, K. J., Gordon, T., Chan, K. M. & Borschel, G. H. Electrical stimulation to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration: Update in molecular investigations and clinical translation. Exp. Neurol. 332, 113397 (2020).
-
Howell, B. & Grill, W. M. In Implantable neuroprostheses for restoring function (ed. Kilgore, K.). Part One, 59–93 (2015).
-
Sheng, X. et al. Design and non-lithographic fabrication of light trapping structures for thin film silicon solar cells. Adv. Mater. 23, 843–847 (2011).
-
Wang, X. et al. Light-triggered pyroelectric nanogenerator based on a pn-junction for self-powered near-infrared photosensing. ACS Nano 11, 8339–8345 (2017).
-
Xi, D. et al. NIR light-driving barrier-free group rotation in nanoparticles with an 88.3% photothermal conversion efficiency for photothermal therapy. Adv. Mater. 32, 1907855 (2020).
-
Löper, P. et al. A membrane device for substrate-free photovoltaic characterization of quantum dot based p-i-n solar cells. Adv. Mater. 24, 3124–3129 (2012).
-
Günter, C., Delbeke, J. & Ortiz-Catalan, M. Safety of long-term electrical peripheral nerve stimulation: review of the state of the art. J. Neuroeng. Rehabilitation 16, 13 (2019).
-
Sahin, M. & Tie, Y. Non-rectangular waveforms for neural stimulation with practical electrodes. J. Neural Eng. 4, 227 (2007).
-
Watling, K., Hope, G. A. & Woods, R. SERS investigation of gold dissolution in chloride and cyanide media. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, D103–D108 (2005).
-
Zhang, Y. et al. Chemomechanics of transfer printing of thin films in a liquid environment. Int. J. Solids Struct. 180-181, 30–44 (2019).
-
Lee, C. H., Kim, D. R. & Zheng, X. Fabricating nanowire devices on diverse substrates by simple transfer-printing methods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9950–9955 (2010).
-
Sheng, H. et al. A thin, deformable, high-performance supercapacitor implant that can be biodegraded and bioabsorbed within an animal body. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe3097 (2021).
-
Founta, V. et al. Properties of ultrathin molybdenum films for interconnect applications. Materialia 24, 101511 (2022).
-
Yin, L. et al. Dissolvable metals for transient electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 645–658 (2014).
-
Wang, H. et al. A 3D biomimetic optoelectronic scaffold repairs cranial defects. Sci. Adv. 9, eabq7750 (2023).
-
Fliss, E. et al. Facial nerve repair following acute nerve injury. Arch. Plast. Surg. 49, 501–509 (2022).
-
Fargher, K. A. & Coulson, S. E. Effectiveness of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation of facial nerve paralysis. Phys. Ther. Rev. 22, 169–176 (2017).
-
Guntinas-Lichius, O. et al. Facial nerve electrodiagnostics for patients with facial palsy: a clinical practice guideline. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 277, 1855–1874 (2020).
-
Kerrebijn, J. D. F. & Freeman, J. L. Facial nerve reconstruction: Outcome and failures: Journal Canadien d’Otolaryngologie. J. Otolaryngol. 27, 183 (1998).
-
Huang, H. et al. Research status of facial nerve repair. Regenerative Ther. 24, 507–514 (2023).
-
Badia, J., Pascual-Font, A., Vivó, M., Udina, E. & Navarro, X. Topographical distribution of motor fascicles in the sciatic-tibial nerve of the rat. Muscle Nerve 42, 192–201 (2010).
-
Guo, W. et al. On the development of modular polyurethane-based bioelastomers for rapid hemostasis and wound healing. Regen. Biomater. 10, rbad019 (2023).
-
Jacques, S. L. Optical properties of biological tissues: a review. Phys. Med. Biol. 58, R37 (2013).
-
Sun, Y. et al. Enhanced neurite outgrowth on a multiblock conductive nerve scaffold with self-powered electrical stimulation. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8, 1900127 (2019).
-
Kline, D. G. Physiological and clinical factors contributing to the timing of nerve repair. Neurosurgery 24, 425–455 (1977).
-
Commission, I. E. in Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements Vol. IEC 60825-1: 2014, 66 (2014).
-
Zuo, K. J. et al. A single session of brief electrical stimulation enhances axon regeneration through nerve autografts. Exp. Neurol. 323, 113074 (2020).
Acknowledgements
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (T2122010, 52171239 to L.Y., 52272277 to X.S., 32171356 to Y.W.), and Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (Z220015 to L.Y.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.S., C.Y., and L.Y. conceived and designed the research project. P.S., C.Y., J.C., Y.H., H.W., X.S., and L.Y. designed and fabricated the devices, and P.S., C.Y., L.W., X.S., and L.Y. performed data analysis. C.Y., P.S., C.L., H.H., Y.G., X.L., M.S., S.C., H.C., W.X., S.W., J.P., and Y.W. performed the animal studies. P.S., Y.M., and M.Z. designed and performed the modeling of the equivalent circuit at the interface. S.L. and K.C. contributed to the photographs and schematic diagrams in the manuscript. C.Y., P.S., and L.Y. wrote the manuscript with inputs from all authors. P.S., C.L., and C.Y. contributed equally to the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Alexandre Oliveira, Eellan Sivanesan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, P., Li, C., Yang, C. et al. A biodegradable and flexible neural interface for transdermal optoelectronic modulation and regeneration of peripheral nerves. Nat Commun 15, 4721 (2024). https://ift.tt/mkWSR9o
-
Received:
-
Accepted:
-
Published:
-
DOI: https://ift.tt/mkWSR9o
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
"interface" - Google News
June 04, 2024 at 12:37AM
https://ift.tt/8qocZkF
A biodegradable and flexible neural interface for transdermal optoelectronic modulation and regeneration of peripheral ... - Nature.com
"interface" - Google News
https://ift.tt/bXpDzBS
https://ift.tt/YlGdm96
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "A biodegradable and flexible neural interface for transdermal optoelectronic modulation and regeneration of peripheral ... - Nature.com"
Post a Comment